Brożek, B., Kanevskaia, O., & Pałka, P. (Eds.). (2023). Research handbook on law and technology. Edward Elgar.

Laskowska-Litak, E. (2023). The subject of copyright: Perspectives from law, aesthetics and cognitive science. Routledge.

Mamak, K. (2023). Robotics, AI and criminal law: Crimes against robots. Routledge.

Laskowska-Litak, E. (2022). Pojęcie utworu w prawie autorskim. Wolters Kluwer Polska.

Brożek, B., Hage, J., & Vincent, N. (Eds.). (2021). Law and mind: A survey of law and the cognitive sciences. Cambridge University Press.

Kucharzyk, B. (2021). Swobodna ocena dowodów. Analiza interdyscyplinarna. Krakowski Instytut Prawa Karnego Fundacja.

Laskowska-Litak, E. (2023). When worlds collide: Copyright law, technology, and legislative drama. In B. Brożek, O. Kanevskaia, & P. Pałka (Eds.), Research handbook on law and technology (pp. 160–174). Edward Elgar.

Pałka, P., & Brożek, B. (2023). How not to get bored, or some thoughts on the methodology of law and technology. In B. Brożek, O. Kanevskaia, & P. Pałka (Eds.), Research handbook on law and technology (pp. 82–99). Edward Elgar.

Brito, B. F., & Pałka, P. (2023). Is centralised general data protection regulation enforcement a constitutional necessity?. European Constitutional Law Review, 19(3), 487–517. doi: 10.1017/S1574019623000202.

Brożek, B. (2023). A new perspective on law’s rationality. An experimental essay. In M. Brigaglia & C. Roversi (Eds.), Legal reasoning and cognitive science: Topics and perspectives (pp. 131–142). Special issue of Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche. http://www.dirittoequestionipubbliche.org/page/2023_dq-recognise/d-04-Brozek.pdf.

Brożek, B. (2023). Cognitive science and the nature of law. Revus, 51. doi: 10.4000/revus.9783.

Brożek, B. (2023). Deontic logic and moral theology. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, 99(2), 369–386. doi: 10.2143/ETL.99.2.3291851.

Brożek, B., Furman, M., Jakubiec, M., & Kucharzyk, B. (2023). The black box problem revisited. Real and imaginary challenges for automated legal decision making. Artificial Intelligence and Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09356-9.

Górska, E., & Juzaszek, A. (2023). The “other” in court: Islam and Muslims in Polish judicial opinions published online. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 36 , 1817–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10008-z.

Jakubiec, M. (2023). Metaphorical simulation and legal reasoning: discovering the legal unconscious. In M. Brigaglia & C. Roversi (Eds.), Legal reasoning and cognitive science: Topics and perspectives (pp. 119–130). Special issue of Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche. http://www.dirittoequestionipubbliche.org/page/2023_dq-recognise/d-03-Jakubiec.pdf.

Kucharzyk, B. (2023). Psychological factors in the evaluation of legal evidence. In M. Brigaglia & C. Roversi (Eds.), Legal reasoning and cognitive science: Topics and perspectives (pp. 417–437). Special issue of Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche. http://www.dirittoequestionipubbliche.org/page/2023_dq-recognise/i-01-Kucharzyk.pdf.

Laskowska-Litak, E. (2023). Technicyzacja a unifikacja prawa autorskiego. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy, (3), 37–45.

Laskowska-Litak, E., & Mania, G. (2023). O nie-literackości pojęcia cytatu. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, 161(3) , 64–74.

Mamak, K. (2023). Cyber banishment: An old sanction for virtual spaces. Criminal Justice Studies, 36(2). doi: 10.1080/1478601X.2023.2188449.

Mamak, K. (2023). The moral significance of the phenomenology of phenomenal consciousness in case of artificial agents. AJOB Neuroscience, 14(2). doi: 10.1080/21507740.2023.2188284.

Mamak, K., Dudek, J., Koniewski, M., & Kwiatkowski, D. (2023). Paradoxes of probation on the possibility of probation decresed the severity of judgments. European Journal of Probation, 15(2). doi: 10.1177/20662203231214877.

Mamak, K., & Glanc, J. (2023). Expunged “by design”: on potential of AI to be a partial enabler in the expungement process. Law, Innovation and Technology, 15(2). doi: 10.1080/17579961.2023.2245682.

Mamak, K., & Kowalczewska, K. (2023). Military robots should not look like a humans. Ethics and Information Technology, 25(3). doi: 10.1007/s10676-023-09718-6.Pałka, P., & Brożek, B. (2023). How not to get bored, or some thoughts on the methodology of law and technology. In B. Brożek, O. Kanevskaia, & P. Pałka (Eds.), Research handbook on law and technology (pp. 82–99). Edward Elgar.

Brożek, B., & Kucharzyk, B. (2022). Causality in the law. In J. J. Jadacki & E. M. Świderski (Eds.), The concept of causality in the Lvov-Warsaw school: The legacy of Jan Łukasiewicz (pp. 249–269). Brill.

Górska, E., & Woźniak-Bobińska, M. (2022). Choosing the lesser evil? English Sunni e-fatwas on abortion. Studia Religiologica, 55(2), 119–135.

Jakubiec, M. (2022). Legal concepts as mental representations. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 35(5), 1837–1855.

Laskowska-Litak, E. (2022). Utwór czy utwory? Zasada jedności utworu a utwory hybrydowe. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, 155(1), 82–113.

Brożek, B. (2021). The architecture of the legal mind. In B. Brożek, J. Hage, & N. Vincent (Eds.), Law and mind: A survey of law and the cognitive sciences (pp. 138–164). Cambridge University Press.

Brożek, B., Hage, J. (2021). Introduction: Between law and the cognitive sciences – a manifesto. In B. Brożek, J. Hage, & N. Vincent (Eds.), Law and mind: A survey of law and the cognitive sciences (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press.

Brożek, B., Jakubiec, M. (2021). Private law and cognitive science: A methodological commentary. In B. Brożek, J. Hage, & N. Vincent (Eds.), Law and mind: A survey of law and the cognitive sciences (pp. 249–254). Cambridge University Press.

Kucharzyk, B. (2021). Some issues in interpreting neuroscientific evidence. In B. Brożek, J. Hage, & N. Vincent (Eds.), Law and mind: A survey of law and the cognitive sciences (pp. 421–430). Cambridge University Press.

Laskowska-Litak, L. (2021). Prawa do artystycznych wykonań w publikacji (art. 85–93). In R. Markiewicz (Ed.), Ustawy autorskie. Komentarze (Vol. 2). Wolters Kluwer Polska.

Laskowska-Litak, L. (2021). Utwór (art. 1); Autorskie prawa zależne (art. 2); Zbiory utworów (art. 3); Parodia, pastisz, karykatura (art. 291); Niezamierzone włączenie utworu do innego utworu (art. 292). In R. Markiewicz (Ed.), Ustawy autorskie. Komentarze (Vol. 1). Wolters Kluwer Polska.

Books:

Kwiatkowska-Wójcikiewicz, V., Krawczyk, R., & Wilk, D. (Eds.). (2023). Piękno kryminalistyki. Księga jubileuszowa Profesora Józefa Wójcikiewicza. Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa. Dom Organizatora.

Papers & Chapters:

Grzyb, M. (2023). The Polish variant of patriarchy? Explaining the relationship between gender inequality and violence against women in Poland. Violence Against Women. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231159415.

Kuca, G., & Woroniecki, P. (2023). Electronic money institution as an example of fintech sector regulation: The case of Poland. In P. Łasak & J. Williams (Eds.), The digital transformation and the economics of banking: Economic, institutional, and social dimensions (pp. 171–184). Routledge.

Tischner, A., & Stasiuk, K. (2023). Spare parts, repairs, trade marks and consumer understanding. IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54(1), 26–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01274-8.

Dybiński, J., & Weber, A. M. (2022). Mandatory dematerialization of shares in Polish private companies: A missed opportunity to do things right. European Company and Financial Law Review, 19(2), 203–238.

Fox Wieloch, N. (2022). Regaining sovereignty? Brexit and the UK Parliament. Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, 70(6), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2022.06.37.

R2S Reports on Law, Technology and Cognitive Science(s)

Starting in 2023 the FLL will once a year publish an open-access expert report on an issue related to interactions between law, empirical sciences, modern technologies or contemporary social phenomena. Reports will be written by teams of researchers and other experts networked with the FLL.

Forthcoming report:

Secure Digital Lending in European libraries

Comparative analysis of the current state of copyright law regarding the possibility for libraries to digitise and lend books under national and European law.

The study was conducted by Centrum Cyfrowe in partnership with the Future Law Lab flagship project within the Priority Research Area Society of the Future under the Strategic Programme Excellence Initiative at Jagiellonian University.

Centrum Cyfrowe Foundation supports users of digital technologies in improving their skills and competencies related to openness and cooperation. We collaborate with institutions to make sure that they work in an open manner in order to carry out their social mission. We work towards adjusting regulations and using legal tools to support the needs and rights of users, as they participate in the open circulation of resources online. We diagnose social and cultural changes that are taking place in our society with the influence of digital technologies, and we introduce a civic responsibility perspective to the public debate on technology.

Future Law Lab (FLL) is a virtual research centre at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland, established under the Strategic Programme Excellence Initiative at Jagiellonian University.

The publication is issued as part of the Knowledge Rights 21 project, funded by Arcadia – a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin.

Autorstwo przyszłości. Ujęcie prawne, filozoficzne i kognitywne (2023). PI:  Laskowska-Litak E. Funding: National Science Center (OPUS 25).

Expert evidence from an interdisciplinary perspective (2023–2026). PI: Bartłomiej Kucharzyk. Funding: National Science Center (SONATA 18).

A natural history of law (2022–2027). PI: Bartosz Brożek. Funding: National Science Center (MAESTRO 13).

The legal imagination (2022–2026). PI: Bartosz Brożek. Funding: National Science Center (OPUS 22).

RECOGNISE: Legal reasoning and cognitive science (2020–2023). Leader: University of Palermo. Partners: Jagiellonian University, University of Bologna, Maastricht University, University of Alicante, University of Ljubljana. Funding: European Commission (Erasmus+ Programme).

DIGITALIZED! Society in the era of digital revolution (2019–2022). Leader: Jagiellonian University. Partners: University of Edinburgh, University of Bologna, KU Leuven, Complutense University of Madrid, Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne University, Free University of Berlin. Funding: Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (International Academic Partnerships Programme).

The architecture of the legal mind (2018–2023). PI: Bartosz Brożek. Funding: National Science Center (OPUS 14).